BAASS Monthly Report November 2009
⚠ Texto extraído por OCR de la fuente oficial — puede contener errores de reconocimiento. El documento original es la autoridad.
1/IIIEIIIIYIEJlllll,ICE
ll1'IICEI1,1cEITIIIEI ®
N ovemtier' 2009
Monthly Report
November
2009 Report
Bigelow Aerospace Advanced
Space Studies
(BAASS)
This lnfom,at1011 Is proprietary and co11fide11tial and ca1111ot be disse111i11ated
QC used wfithout prior writteA consent frem the Operating Manager or SAA"SS".
PREFACE
This Progress report summarizes BAAS$ activities and progress for the
period November 1- November 30, 2009.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Topics covered in this report are the following:
Summary of M UFON Invest igative Activity for November 2009 .....................Page 3
Progress on Utah Ra nch l nvestigations ............... ................................................ Page 59
Preliminary Report on a Blue Orb lncident................................................ ....... Page 126
Conclusion.................. ... .......................................................................................Page 154
2
Summary of Cases That MUFON Investigated
During November 2009
In February 2009, BAASS executed a Purchase order with MUFON that
entitles BAASS to: (a) receive notification of significant reports on UAP sightings
from anywhere in the United States within hours, (b) receive timely reports from
MU FON investigators regarding investigations of these incidents (c) receive
physical evidence (including photographs, digital recordings, samples of soil,
insects, plants, and animals) for scientific analysis. BAASS has multiple
laboratories that are ready to conduct forensic, photographic, metallurgic,
chemical, isotope, biological, chemical analysis of any specimens that BAASS
receives from MUFON.
It should be noted that during the month of October 2009, BAASS
conducted an appraisal of MUFON's performance to date. BAASS was dissatisfied
with MUFON's tendency to warehouse significant sums of money every month,
especially during the early stages of the contract. Hence, for the remainder of the
contract, BAASS will be reducing the monthly stipend to MU FON by $10,000. This
will still enable MUFON to operate at normal efficiencies as they spend down the
remaining surplus money.
The following are selected investigative reports from MUFON deployments
during the months of October 2009.
3
~ MIJF©N Mutual UFONelw0tk
Case Report MUFON SIP Deployment
Case# 19865 Case Type: Cat 2
i p Person 116
Investigator:.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___,
1843 3
GPS COORDINATES : .1..._ _ (-a)-( _) _ _ _ _ _ ___,
COORDINATES ACCURACY: Location of witness vehicle on higlnway where sighting
occurred . Object was seen 30-50 feet to the East at approx. 25' altitude.
LOCATION: Railroad crossing ot843(a)(3) ~odesto, CA
DATE OF EVENT: 10-07-09
TIME OF EVENT:20:04:00 ( ) Exact ( x ) Approximate
4
On 10-13-09 a CAT 3 Star team Deployment in Modesto, CA was authorized
and !'°AP Person 116 ras assigned as lead investigator.
f P Person 59
MUFON (Mutual UFO Network)
STAR Team Manager
SIP Project Coordi nator
Background:
Two witnesses (father and 6 yr. old daughter) in a rural area first observed and
photographed two blue elevated lights in flight approximately a mile away
towards town. Witness drove towards objects for better view. Upon arriving at
general site, objects converged in flight upon witnesses from left and right to a
hovering position viewed from front auto window. Frightened by the event and
belief that objects began following them, witness drove rapidly one half mile
into town and a mile beyond where objects were no longer observed. Daughter
developed a chest rash the nest day.
Narrative:
Thursday 10/15/09 17:50
Drove to Modesto, CA and arrived 19:07 at california Highway Patrol at 4030
Kiernan Ave., only to find the office closed.
Drove the route that reporting witness took on the night of his sighting to
familiarize myself with surroundings, abstractions, lighting, traffic, and details
included in his report.
s
Drove to the church and waited until 20:00 when witness came out of the
church. As soon as we met and made Introductions, witness offered to show me
his route and stops for different events.
We drove south on Tully Road and stopped midway between Kiernan Ave and
Bangs Ave where witness took his 3 photos of the 2 blue lights with his cell
phone looking southeast. (We later discovered the location of the 2 blue lights
were very close to the vicinity of the Modesto Hobby and Crafts Store on Bangs
Avenue east of Tully Road approximately 3000 feet away from witness's camera
shots.)
We then drove east on Bangs Avenue and stopped on the east side of the
railroad tracks where witness stated, " ...my vehicle was converged on from the
fields from the north and south just before the auto dealership on my right. I
could see them from my front window a roximatel thlrt to flft feet awa )
with one being above the other'' 1843(a)(3)
i;:,43(a) ..___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.......
1
We soon discovered the Modesto Hobby and Crafts Store was on Bangs Avenue
approximately 800 feet from the railroad crossing between the tracks and the
auto dealership. Hobby store was closed.
We continued to travel east on Bangs Avenue past the Modesto Hobby and
Crafts Store and auto dealership to the stoplight on McHenry Avenue where we
turned right and drove two blocks through Pelandale Avenue where witness's
daughter had stated, "Daddy, it is following us". From this location, an
illuminated aerial object above the railroad crossing could still be in view at
approximately 4400 feet away.
We drove one block farther south on McHenry to approach the next stoplight at
E. Union Avenue where, on the night of this event, a police car was parked and
many workers had been repaving the road. When witness's daughter was asked
if she still saw it, she said, "Yes". It is questionable if these other people had also
6
seen these blue lights although approximately 6000 feet from the railroad
crossing.
By the time we drove another block ("' 1200 feet ) south on McHenry Avenue to
Standiford Avenue, witness's daughter had said, "It went away". (Total distance
from railroad crossing "'7200 feet)
I didn't see any rash on witness's daughter's chest.******* will send me a
picture of It. The origin of the rash is unknown, perhaps stress.
I did not find any knowledgeable person at the Boyett Gas Service Station in the
vicinity to interview.
Witness was leaning towards the hobby shop model remote controlled airplane
hoax scenario through discussion with friends. Because of this inclination,
witness does not want to talk to BAASS or any other third party. I have good
working communications now through witness for networking in the Modesto
area and I expect to hear from him as he explores his suspicions further with his
personal friends and hobby store.
IAAP Person 116
MUFON Star Team Investigator
With new info from******* below, I listed identity of objects in CMS Report as:
IFO-Man-Made Objects.
cd
............................................................................................................
7
New info:
From: IAAP Person 117
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:57 PM
To:IAAP Person 124 Hf-AP Person 59 ~AAP Person 103 l!AAP Person 116
Subject: Investigator notes - reeval uating CMS 19865?
October 29. 2009
AAP Person Hi
103
I·._,- - -
I read your report - I concur with Investigators assessment that daughter of
witness possibly may have suffered a rash due to stress (frightened).
However, perhaps from experience, something did not seem right.
I noticed you mentioned a local hobby store in your report. I used to fly RC
model planes and thought to check to see if model aircraft were flying the night
and location of sighting. Maneuvers of objects in witness report suggested
lights could be model planes.
After reading investigator report, I contactedDwho answered store phone -1843 (a)( 2)
an employee of 'Modesto Hobby and Crafts' -401 Bangs AVE #H Modesto Ca
(209)529-7310
Often local hobby shops are a invaluable source of information on local model
flying clubs as well.
This store is very near location model flying location of the UFO sighting
reported in CMS 19865.
8
http://www.modestohobby.com/
Contacting Store nearby location of sighting.... ••••••• confirmed a number of
hobbyists' fly their model gliders at night or early often most evenings. •••••••
also confirmed they all use bright blue colored lights on their gliders to see their
models. These models are unpowered gliders (perhaps 'slope gliders'?)
••••••• also confirmed they were flying models matching the maneuvers also -
the same night and time of UFO sighting October 7,, 2009 (20:00 hours
PDT). ••••••• also commented that they get many UFO reports from cars
passing in area according to Modesto Police Dept .. The Modesto Police Dept
has sometimes shown up at model air field in response to a UFO report phoned
into Modesto police according to employee •••••••.
Based on this new new information, before approving case - recommend
investigator consider reevaluation of case deposition from 'Unknown' to 'IFO:
Man Made Object' {RC model gliders with blue lights attached.)?
Most Respectfully,
IAAP Person 117
Chief Investigator
SC
October 29, 2009
9
Case Report MUFON SIP Deployment
Star Team cat. 3 Case #20143
lnvestlgator:IAAP Person 109
843 2 1843 3
GPS coo RDINATES: 11....._ _(a-)( _)._ _ _ca_)( _>- - - - - - - - - - - 1
11843(a)(2). 1843(a)(3)
COORDINATES ACCURACY: possible craft landing sight adjacent to witness property
LOCATION: Versailles, Mo 11843(a)(2), 1843{a)(3)
DATE OF EVENT: Sunday October 25, 2009
TIME OF EVENT: 1:30 AM to 5:30 AM local ( ) Exact ( x) Approximate Duration 4 hours AAP Person
109, ,,•
,•'
On 10-26-09 a CAT 3 Star team Deployment In Versailles, MO was authorized and I ·· /
AAP P:rso~.. j .. -·· . . !was assigned as lead Investigator~ . _lMissouri MUFON) Assistant State
109 Director accompanied her and assisted with the investigatiori-----...... .
•--AAP Person
jAAP Person 59 l 11 8 -
MUFON (Mutual UFO Network)
STAR Team Manager
SIP Project Coordinator
Background: ••••••••: witness goes by******
10
The witness******* saw a large craft land in the woods through his bedroom
window at approximately 1:30 AM the morning of Oct. 25, 2009. He and his wife
watched it through the window for between 15 and 30 minutes before he
decided to go outside for a better view. When ******* went outside he noticed
that there were also several small objects much closer, low in the woods. He
went into the house, woke his eleven year old son, grabbed binoculars and they
both went outside to get a closer look. The two of them saw the large craft deep
in the woods which was an upright triangle shape with several different color
lights; silver, green, blue, orange, and red all flashing. In the woods much lower,
were three "saucer" shaped orange/red lights which were in a field to the west.
Two of these were in the woods below the far neighbors dusk to dawns and the
third even lower being seen by******* and his son while on their knees on the
back deck of their home. Farther to the left of their deck (west), they spotted 3
more orange/red lights in the woods and a little farther to the left one blue light
that briefly flashed for a total of seven lights, not counting the craft. These light
were small and spinning and so bright that they were visible even without the
binoculars. After about an hour, the lights changed from saucer shaped to round
and began spinning in a different manor. They were now the shape and size of a
soccer ball having compressed but not more than half their original size. The
lights still proceeded to flash orange/red brighter and dimmer and move slowly
about the woods as they spun. The large craft stayed stationary. This was all in
the woods behind the family's home the craft being directly north and the lights
being south/west of the craft. After hiking with******* through the woods and
finding the spot, we determined by using my range finder that the large craft had
landed .7 miles behind *******'s house in the direction directly north.
After an hour or so of viewing the craft and the lights, * **** noticed a figure of
what he thought was a person standing on the ridge behind the house much
closer than the craft or lights. (He noticed this because a deer ran close by across
the woods in front of him snorting.) The being was determined to be about five
feet tall and wearing something horizontally striped, that was black and white and
loose fitting like a down jacket. The being was holding something in his/its left
hand and had it up to its mouth like he was talking into it. There was also what
looked like a back-pack placed on the ground in front of the being at its feet.
******* described the figure's face and hands as being white in color. He was
looking through binoculars and wasn't sure if it was skin he was seeing or some
type of mask. After measuring the area and viewing the video tape that I took of
the area, we determined the being to be standing about 50 yards from the back of
11
their home. I asked******* what he did when he saw the being, and he said that
he told his son to run in the house which his son did. ******* said that he stared
at the being through binoculars for several minutes seeming to be "staring each
other out". I asked him when, why, and how did this end. The reply was that he
got tired and decided to go inside the house. ******* then described watching
the craft through the bedroom window falling asleep and re-awaking to watch
periodically until about 5:30AM when he woke to check for the last time and the
craft was gone. He thought that he was only asleep for about 15-20 minutes but
missed the craft leaving the woods.
Investigation Report:
Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:30PM
1'f: Person ~issouri MUFON Assistant State Director, who was assisting me on
this case, interviewed the other witnesses who were *******'s wife, and two
sons. I hiked into the wood with ******* in an attempt to find some trace
evidence of the landing sight. The sight was due north .7 miles from the back of
*******'s home as we determined later with my range finder. We walked
through the woods to a ridge which we suspected to be where the being was
standing the night of the sighting. We came to this conclusion because this was
the only place in the area in question where the being would be visible as close as
he/it was seen from the back deck of ****** 's home. This area was about 50
yards away. When we reached this ridge, I noticed a chipmunk on a small tree
and a few feet away a turtle. Both were alive and very close to where the being
1843 (a)( 2 ) stood;-·- **j)k~**'-s-du~ho we took with us to determine if there was any
animal reaction, sat in this sQot with no remorse. But, when we hiked down the
EJ
1843 (a)( 2 ) .... ridge -st:le-refusecl to follow. made her way west staying on the ridge but
watching us cross the woods. We hiked down through rough terrain, up another
ridge, across a small creek, and across more rough terrain. Even though this area
was fairly flat with some trees down, ******* determined that this couldn't be
the spot because he couldn't see his house. We made our way up another ridge
and down, across a barbed wire fence, up and over another ridge to another flat
area deep in the woods. From this point we could see the back of *******'s
home through binoculars and he determined that this was the right distance away
into the woods. We hiked around carefully not disturbing any possible foot
prints, tracts, etc. I notice an area with small bare spots but this was as obvious
wash off from a ridge farther north. Further to the west of this area I noticed
12
broken trees. Some were old breaks but several were new broken limbs and
small uprooted trees. I also came across an uncharacteristic bare area which I
measured to be 6 toot 6 inches, by 7 foot 6 inches square. There were heavy
leaves covering the entire area except for this one spot which was bare except for
a few leaves which had blown over it. I took a reading with my Geiger counter
and EMF meter but nothing registered. To the north edge of this bare area I could
see pushed over dirt like it was cleanly scraped from the surface taking all the
grass and leaves with it. The dirt area left wasn't dug in where I could make a
mold, but seemed to me to be raised a bit over the rest of the area terrain. I
collected a dirt sample from the center of this area, and a sample from the area
that was pushed up. I also took a compass reading of the area as reference
noticing that was my compass was off. I lined myself up to the house directly as I
had done before we left and it read 40 degrees off to the east instead of due
north as it should have. I walked east about thirty feet and took another reading
which was 20 degrees off to the east, then back to the spot which again was 40
degrees off. I teach underwater navigation so I know how to use a compass and
this was definitely off. The compass read 40 degrees off even when I walked
thirty feet to the west of the patch of dirt which I will assume at this point could
be the possible landing sight. Around this area (in about a 25 foot ratio) were
small raised areas in the ground as well. These ranged from football size to twice
that size. These areas looked like mole mounds but much bigger. Most of them
were raised up with brown dirt, but two of them had a strange orangish clay
color. I took dirt samples of these as well.
Another strange effect was *******'s dogD First she sat where.the 1843(a)(2)
unidentified being stood, next she refused to cross the terrain with******* and
me but made her way around to the west of us, and finally her last reaction to the
area. ******* had been carrying my Star Team bag for me. (He was a real
gentleman and insisted). When he lay the bag down on sight, I eventually moved
it close to the bare spot I was documenting. O came over to it and l.ay down 1843(a)(2 )
next to the bag not budging until we left the sight. The bag had *******'s scent
on it and it seemed like she was using it as a safe place.
After documenting the possible craft landing sight, we traveled southwest
towards the areas where the balls of light were seen. About 75 feet from the
primary sight I spotted two mysteries holes. They were side by side, and exactly 1
foot 6 inches apart. These holes were around 10 inches deep with a narrow hole
area at an angle at the bottom. At first I thought they were snake holes, so I
cleared off the leaves and noticed that the hole at the bottom ended. These two
13
matching holes were 1 ft 4 in. X 1 ft 4 in. round at the top each being the same.
took pictures as documentation. At this time we were at about 5:30PM and
loosing light. We still had two more sights to get to before dark and several
inches of rain moving in the next day so we moved on.
******* took me to another sight which was a large grassy area. This is where he
suspected that three of the balls of light were. All we saw were horse shoe tracts,
deer tracks and dung. We hiked to the next area where we were met with an
electric fence. This is where he saw the other three orange/red balls of light and
the one brief blue one. At the far end of the field we noticed another square bare
area. I took pictures and video for reference. Upon viewing the video I noticed
that this area was nothing like the sight found before, but an area where the
rancher places hay for his horses/cattle.
The area in question we covered was a minimum½ mile wide, and .7 miles from
the witness's home. Because of this, no out of area dirt samples were possible.
******* also told me about an occurrence on Monday night Oct. 26, 2009 at
about 1:30 AM (technically Oct. 2ih.) ******* was out watching the night sky,
for obvious reasons, when he saw 2 military jets flying grids across the sky. He
watched them from 1:30 AM to 2:30/3:00 AM. They were flying search pattern
grids and dropped 3 flares lighting the sky. He said that the flares were dropped
at different times to keep the sky lit. Because of the fog that night the sky/woods
seemed to almost glow blue with the orange flares. ******* told me that if they
were searching for the craft they were searching too far southwest.
********: Interview 6:30 to 7:00 PM Oct. 28, 2009
~ : P~-~~()~ -l - ---- lwas able to recover******* and I via cell phone contact½ mile away
west of *******'s house. (We got lost a bit) I took the opportunity to interview
*******'s neighbor on the way back.
*******is *******'s neighbor who is located about 10 acres to the west of
*******. On the night of Oct. 26, 2009 ******* noticed 4 F-111 jets out of
Whiteman Air Field going about 80 knots and running cross-stagger grids.
******* has a good description of the activity because he was a Marine Air-Wing
for seven years. He remembers that it was just before his wife came home from
work at 11:00 PM. Prior to this he witnessed 2 military helicopters circling the
area for just a few minutes. He described the grids as being close proximity with
14
low slow flight. He only watched them for a few minutes but heard them for
quite some time. I asked him if this was usual activity and he said that he had
only seen this one time before about 8 months ago. He has seen military
maneuvers practiced over head but the last was during the day 3 months prior
with dog-fight activity and flying high altitude. Whiteman Air Field is about an
hour drive away but just a few minutes fly time by jet. ••••••• didn't see the jets
drop flares or the helicopter shine a search light. If these were in fact military
helicopters, their night vision/heat sensors would rule out the need for a search
light.
******* hadn't seen any strange lights in the past few weeks or prior, but had
heard deer running and snorting late night over the past few days. One of his
dogs has also been bedding down close to a tree starting at dusk the last few
nights and not moving until dawn. He said that the dog was fine during the day,
not sickly, eating as usual, but strangely skittish at night.
'{;': P~rson_I I******* and I got back to *******'s house just about dark. Before we
could get set up for night observing of the area we had a strange light appear in
AAP Person the northern sky.
118 •
I lgot a few still shots and I got some night vision video.
•
The light remained stationary for several minutes then seemed to slowly set in
the northern sky, shifting east a few degrees, then disappearing and reappearing
more to the west. Terrestrial activity rises in the east and sets in the west. Stars
don't set in the north, shifting position in the sky or disappearing and
reappearing. This went on for more than an hour. We also had other strange
streaks and balls of light cross the northern sky and my night vision picked up a
couple of strange effects including one wide white streak. Further analysis of our
video and still pictures is pending.
NOTE: Lake of the Ozarks is only 10 miles south of this location.
Conclusion: Unknown UAV, Entity, and Landing Sight. CAT. 3
*Video and still shot documentation of sight and witnesses
* 4 soil samples taken
15
..• lq I
1\,-,'~ , , /,1,.Al .f'
'/ ' , .
I
I ..-,
I
~
Drawings
I'-·
I
•
f s
..
Ill (- r)/o.
• •
f.• ~ I
"1
,I
c,.l \
I ..
W1 \, I...
~~i,1
,,,
l.;i
)
Drawings
\l\)t.rt~ d.1-
t•Jr-l I .la
Case Report MUFON SIP Deployment
CASE# CASE TYPE:
CAT 2
► 20595 - Santo
► 20598 - Stephenville
► 20610 -Hico
► 20616 - Hico
► 20618- De Leon
► 20629 - Dublin
► 20660 - Breckenridge
► More cases will be added to this list as the witnesses file them. (20806 just
added- no workup yet)
On November 24, 2009, 6,cases were combined into one SIP call. All calls invol\led lights-in-the-sky that resembled
golf-to-dime- size lights {a1 arm's length}. These calls were located in the central Texas area as indicated by the town
names above.
INVESTIGATOR:r
....~ 119
_P_P_er_so_n_________________,
GPS COORDINATES :
1843(a)(3)
► 20595 - Santo
► 20598 - Steohenville
► 20610-Hico
► 20616-Hico
► 20618 - De Leon
► 20629 - Dublin
► 20660 - Breckenrldae
COORDINATES ACCURACY:_Coordinates are accurate according to witness descriptions and
Google Earth.
LOCATION: CITY, STATE COUNTY: All in Texas - Santo-PALO PINTOCOUNTY; Stephenvil~-ERATH
COUNTY; Hico - HAMILTON COUNTY{2); De Leon- COMANCHE COUNTY; Dublin - ERATH COUNTY;
Breckenridge- STEPHENS COUNTY. Others can be added later. No time on this report.
DATE OF EVENT: November 18, 2009
18
TIME OF EVENT: LOCAL ( ) EXACT (X) APPROXIMATE
MP Person
vember 24, 2009, a CAT (2) Star t eam Deployment In TeKas was authorized...
. . .
l __ ·········_
_ ······_ .
.1, 9
... P Person
····1AA
.. ........... was assigned as lead investigator.
119
!MP Person 59 l
MUFON (Mutual UFO Network)
STAR Team Manager
SIP Project Coordinator
BACKGROUND: Many central Texas residents were Witness to asudden light show by an object, or objects
unknown. Over a period of nearly 1 hr and 5minutes, extremely high-intensity lights came on, off, and on for a
second or two and thenwent off. These lights seem to be inastraight line with the whole light array moving to
another location close by and coming on again. The earliest sighting was 19:00 with the latest reported 20:05. Other
witnesses said there were,4smaller lights with the larger lights. These numbered anywhere from 0-4.
INVESTIGATOR NARRATIVE: Witness comments inblack and Investigator comments In red-
20595 - Santo
At approximately 19:33, 2 miles west of Santo TX, I was in the process of feeding my dogs when I noticed out of the
comer of eye a (flash) bright light. I stopped to look (190• SSW) and the bright light began to dim, then immediately a
second light Illuminated for one second, then athird for one second and thenafourth. After the fourth illumination. I
53.W 4tiny white dots moving very slowly across the sky and within asecond or two all the lights dlStJ.ppeared. They
reappeared in almost the same area, in the same pattern and it happened again for atotal of 3cycles.
They were approximately 200ft AGL, 2miles from our home. The Interstate is a mile from home and the sighting
about a mile further on. Tlhese lights were very slow moving. Using the 1-20 hwy as comparisonof 70-75 MPH, these
lights were going about 30 MPH heading ESE. At junction of FM 4, objects turned more to SSE. (there is another
witness according to this witness who also saw the object at this time}.The colors were a white ( yellowish orange)
that seem tochange colors and almost flicker.
I cannot help but see some controlling factor in these actions. The difference here seems to be aflicker ingof the
li~hts and4 llghts. Witness is a pilot, works forl1 843(a)(2) jgave extremely accurate descriptions andwas the best
witness.
19
Witness said all the lights were a bright white, but his wife said they were more orangy. Witness indicated that trucks
on the Interstate are app 4" long to his sight, and this object was 10-12" long. He estimated that the object was
approximately 200' long. There may be others calls on this generated by his friend and co-workers.
This witness said when the lights would come on, they were like explosions. No sound,just a bright flash as they
came on. Witness also Indicated that he did not here any jets at that time or later.
1843(a)(2)
Figure 1 (20S95) Graphic by witness In Santo
20
1843{a){3)
Figure 2 (20595) Orange block indicates an object at the place of the Santo sighti ng
20M- Stephenylle
Iwas~ homeflom my in-Ins hola who live In . .Greenscnekna between Stlphenville and Dubin but mm
near IM>llrl wllh my bl yes old and 12Wll9k old In the car wllh 1111. HW11 nat long after Itumad alfof Coooty Road 242
which I had been,-- nor11. on ID amher 00ll1ly road, I ba1ie¥e II la Colllt, fad 381 haallng south east. It was not
~ alls I ti.med cno Q>unty Road 381 11111 ralcld,two bright lights lo ltasky.
0utr1tt1ea mn my wild8t1leld . . .,, mrl!ft w IIQtJllY ,._ MVinllaf 'M1PD was lhal m MD Plnll,
lhlv Wll8 orangish in color ll]d ltlay wn apartblJ K I llcMed down and leaned bW8ld in my 1811 IIO irMlllgal9
w11a11was1111Rg. l100n,...tleJW118 ■ t>c>IIJl1Qap1an1Ma101tasoonas 1 cana1plhll1taima
anottw M Pftrd P4 l)d tp 1b9 IID9'b lkft on my rbbtaod lllfl fQlQJac IQbt IQMlld abcM b nr« lk#
n1Q 11 !ilbminq • DbWJl b •allpyl• ff MB••
The IJNs WIii stationary In tw lky or,y npi)a. At 1ht new llgbla 1111181d I started fleakilg out. /w you wall know
UFO 8"'11osa piwaleltln cune and I ClOlil not bellM that I c:md be pmaibl'f wll'IIINing It t>r mpelf. Prob1b1v I
98COQd M h nay ldJl!1ffll'ld lharfadat! teimi wlb tho blmt on my 11ft
. Otce Iha oo the left sla1ed lo show up I did oot as midi allelb ID ht
n bothev wndl rolJ1iDlalllv
oo the fll' right.
21
Ido not bellM It changed tu do not f8C8II when for sure tt faded alhough I know ft was within 8IOOndl of the other
a
~his. In all the event lD0k pa In probably la) 2minutes. The 1hought of the UFO avhtfl9S did not oocurred 10
me• h tllid ard fourth~ IPJllll8d but I was really Iha manner 1hat the llghts faded that convinced me that I had just
witnes8ed lllnll:..,hl,nn
I was very edad n ahockad about what I had juat seen and got on lhe phone to ahare it Mth my husband
lmmedllllely. My ~ng call1D mn want 7:44 P.M. Therefore I approximate the slghti~ klok place at 7:42 PJ~.J just
rec:eiYed W0fd wla Fabook that afriend d mine also wlne8sed lgta In the sky 1h11 twining although I do not know the
specfflcs of their slg~.
According to the Clark Flek:I Municipal Airfield Manager, another man had told him of 3helicopters off hwy 377 between
Dublin and Stephenville in alrfangulation and range finding exercise aweek or two before the 25111
This area does correspond to lhe location of some of the sightings, Wilh the dales of the sightings being on the 18111, that
lands exacUy 1week to the day of the sightings. He indicated that the high-intensity lights were not orange, but white, Red
and green navigation lights were also visible This does not agree with afew other witnesses, but lhey may have been too
far from them to see navigation lights
. I will make note of the fact here that aircraft do not have to run with lights while In the Brownwood MOA's. Of note, Clark
field has no radios and no radar. Consideration was given to the possibility of the Helicopters com111g from Ft. Hood, Dyess
orcarswell
figure 3 Brownwood 1 East MOA is over most of the sighting area and close to the rest. It might be
noted that flight mutes and power transmission lines are in the Jrea.
22
Figure 4 (20598) sighting line was judged to be 156 degrees by m easurement.
1843(a)(3)
l
Figure 5 (20598) Line of sight Intersects with one yellow t arget on the timellne and is very close to an orange
th
target at 01:45:32 (GMT 19 )
23
On aradar image out of OFW, (F19ure 6) given the distance. the orange image below the blue sighting line indicates lhat
this object was between 4000 and 6000 ft above ground Hard targets In red-orange west were 1n Brown county headed
east at or above 10000 ft
To be that far away and that h19h eliminates most, 1f not all ground clutter, birds, bugs, etc. The large yellow target also
Indicates asolid target It is also important to realize that the call lo witness's husband was made at 7:44 pm ano she
guessed the time of sighting at 7:42 pm. I believe this all falls within the limes of the radar image. Video of the radar
sighting eve[)' 10 minutes showed lhat the traffic In the lower left of Figure6. (red and orange) was moving In an eastward
direction Addltlonal radar searching Is needed lo finish this.
1843(8)(3)
...........,................ ... .,
,,,
th
Figure 6 (20598) Radar Image out of Ft. Worth at 01:45:32 (GMT 19 )
24
20610-Hico
~6P:r.~~-~ .R~PQrt wastaken..by.Mufon_Dispatcll,l1-- -
3 - 6 liqhts In astraight line flashing.objects were along distance away the size of this was monstrous, IT lights were
connected tone object this is true.
Witness was off highway 6, Between Rising Star and Comanche
The lights were very bright orange,
jets were chasing objects and a lot smaller than this obj~
viewed for 45 sec lo a minute.
afriend saw the object in Abilene, 30 min poor to this sighti
7witnesses in Stephenville ,
A friend who is a police officer has adashboard video (dashboard deo Is of the 2008 sigh ings) but does not in anyway
what his name used.
Witness has pictures and video and can get pictures and videos from other witnesses. lnves • ator has seen photos and is
(lying to get co . Witness !so reported that there ere 4iets 1n the area some m,nu!es after the sighting. He indicated
that he was tn a large pickup that nigh.I and it seemed ry small in comparison to Iha ex1remely large objec . These
distance-judging episodes at night are notoriously hard o accurately portray.
25
() 0 0 C) ()
I I , ' l
Figure 7 (20610) Hand drawing provlclecl by witness. Witness Indicat ed that he thought t here were darker
areas between the lights signifying an ext remely large object. I think unlighted area next to lights would look
that way at night. No proof hore of an object.
26
Figure 8 (20610) Witnesses line of sight (begins NW of Comanche 10 miles) led his view across Lake Proctor
toward area of other sightings and is itself well into the Brownwood Military Operating Area as shown.
20616- Hico
i begin in saying that this is not an unordinary event as we see these lights every once in a while outside in our yard
.we live way out in the country 8 miles out from a town so at night it is quite easy lo see anything in the night sky. We
never have reported these sightings as a lot of people do around here as we live 8miles from Stephenville TX and 10
or so miles from Dublin Texas. but last night we saw the lights at the same level in the sky .(direction and level not
available at this time).id say a t ~ of these. It was around dinner time soi was in the kitchen at first and since the
lights had been seen lately we had been looking outside once in a while at night.
My husband and i walked out and were only out for a minute and then we saw them...i guess thatwas a lucky thing. I
didn't have to wonderwhat it was since these lights have been seen here off and on for gutte a while now...guess
they like the dairies around this area of teas. The rather rourd orange lights (that look almost all the same size)just
last afew seconds then they disappear.
27
Of course your real excited when we are seeing these lights..and then they are gone (maybe not really gone,just
change position so we can no longer see them)..almost always afterwards we see the blinking of jets and hear the
jets coming in the area. Have not reached this witness and have no reply to email.. Since we had had some news
only acouple of weeks ago about the unexplained lights again in the Stephenville paper people in this area start
looking around at night again to see UFOs. Actually we had seen the lights last October and were waiting for this
October to look again ..but it was cloudy most of the month. Now it is November and we saw them last night.
More to come in this section--
Figure 9 (Z061611843(a)(2) Iof Lights In the Texas Sky pulled the MUFON report off CMS and created a
drawing based on the sighting report.
28
20818- Qt Leon
My mohr and I wt laM!g Da Leon Texasm twwy 6 n jull pm the Leon river bridge In Ille cleari1g I happen to see
. . .up IDIIBY-Ml laokld I111811411111d lgtJll pa MPiU b lca,.,pQl;IJII Ill whit& lo mum
b1glllll Ml emteetor And amoment laltrthn w MOlherrm to the lift of the flllt. The one on the~ d ~
and ttlelaft applald. And fora brlaf momanttheywnlogllhar.lhan 1hly boll Wll'l gone. They wn large in Size and
dd notto..,._-, bewiy hlfl '1 elevation. Fl'QIII hlgh!!Y 6 lwf w a r e ~ tam matDwards Confine, Lake
1843(a)(2) .. PnldDr...o.r norlrNtllDublL Sbangeetttlln; my.ffdlerf:_Jand I hM ever seen. Orqaffthlt8 lqJls ID aMQi stajpht
b ID 4MthenfllCDQd lghlltboWJO .181hand tdtthor Wtr:f the Iii 2n#JOWD,
tmastgatot calculated from wlness deeatptiQn ofvmual through acarfront wi"ldshield that the object was 30 degrees off
the oortzon lhtwftnaaga,,a agues., of SE as 1h11 cirec:lkJn d h t - -. From lt1ll eight, ua~ witness diedlone.
lnY881gator plollad dle ckV988 d Iha slghllng at SA> 140deglaes. There are red lghls on wnl turbines tothe North with
helWy air 1rafflc ii atd outof OFW. Of note, lhere are 2 rows d hlgh-W>lage l)OWBf' Ines Just south of Lake Proctor. This
It just off hwy m lnvesligalof spent soma 30 mutas at 1185118 on Tuesday niJhl November 24", 2009 at the same
apptDanaltfimeas lhelllGflllng for compnliYeP'fpoaeland t>shootdlracllcns. The S'9nttng was In a LO.S.difectly
cNer the "ghost town• of COMYN \ffllch lscff FM 1496. Wltnas8 also said that the lights came on in a11ast1• as did the
Sri> wllness
f igure 10 (20618) LO.S. at 177 degrees
29
r ■ - r T 20629 - Dublin r • I ,.
I was drtving home from De Leon Texas toward 0ublin....Was about 5 miles out of Deleon...when 4 or 5 very bright circles
appeared In the sky....
3 large and 2 smaller....lt appeared that the smaller ones moved toward the large one like achild to its mother, very very
fast then they shot upward what looked like they disappeared behind the clouds .
Part of this statement about .clouds does not match the other witness statements or the weather bureau. Further checks
will be made later. Also, this is one of lhe statements in which the lights move quickly. Others suggest differently. Witness
said it was nearly dark which falls into line wi(h the other statements.
None of this lasted very long....Llghts were very brtght nothing else was In the sky....l had no Idea what these were, but I
knew they were not jets, Jets do not move that fast. .. Did not mention this to anyone but I did see where a couple my age
noticed the same thing.... 4 or 6bright circles ; West of Dublin..
I I
- ,. - • I -f
Picture shows five lights...2large and 3 small ones. The followi11g from an email:•
I saw 5 objects (clroles) 2the size of golf balls and 3 the size of adime one large one and 3small ones where In aline
with one large one at the rear but upward about what looked like maybe 8to 10 feet.
. A check with the Dublin police department did no[ show any 'lights" call on !hat day or the next. Alater visit to the
newspaper office uncovered s~tl article about another sighting on that night. This coincides with the other sightings. The
article also indicated 4-6 orange balls1usl East and Soulh" of town.
Sighting lasted avery short time and there was no noise. Wllness Indicated that there were els in the vicmit , The first
witness in this case Is retired from the Air Force and 1843 a 2
30
... j J • , .,
.., ' ,.
...
Figure 11 (20629) Sighting l ights Hand drawn by w itness
31
"t-1_ _1 1 _ ,_ _ _ _.,
COMPOS !TE P EF. 2• 8 NM
KOYX • Ol'fSS ~f&, TX
[:~
flf~
~~= 1843{a)(3)
MOO E, VCP: & I Jl
Ltotlld: cfBZ (Ctttoorv)
... 2, (1$)
t- 24 {14 )
,._ 20 ( ll)
+ 16 (I Z)
• 12 (11)
+. (10)
♦ 4 (9)
0 (I )
• ~ (7)
• • (6)
• 1: 15)
• 16
• 20 3
"!
• 24 (2 )
• 28 (1)
Figure 12. (20629) Dyess long-range composite for 01:07:40 GMT-Yellow block Is In line NE,£ from witness
position.
32
Figure 13 (20629) "Mystery Lights" article refer to the same sighting by another witness
Figure 14 The (20629) sighting was in the NNE direction at app 30 degree
20660- Breckenridge
This witness described the light in the following: 2009-11-18 20:05:00 was at my home, which is East of Breckenridge. I
noticed what I thought was a commercial jet flying East to west in same flight path as an earlier plane but noticed the lights
did not disappear (flash), like navigational lights.
V66 is the commercial air route visible from witness location. "Visual routes are used by the Department of Defense and
associated Reserve and Alr Guard units for the purpose of conducting low altitude navigation and tactical training under
VFR below 10,000 ft MSL at airspeeds in excess of 250 knots IAS".(fAA Special Use Airspace &Air Traffic Controlled
Assigned Alrsp<£e website)
These lights pulsed in sequence. I got my binoculars and saw 4amber (orange/white) colored lights in a row, with what
appeared to be asmaller light on the bottom of the object near the leading end. The smaller light would flash reel, then
33
white. As brightly lit as the object was, I still could not make out aruselage, tail. or wings. If it were a commercial or military
Jet, I should seen an outline and would have heard the sound ofJet engines, however, there was complete silence.
If It had been ahelicopter, Idoubt l would have heard it(too high. too far away), and at that distance l would have barely
seen it if at all. I ruled out jet aircraft and helicopter.
The object appeared to be at an altitude of about 10,000 feet and perhaps 20 miles from my location. By my estimate, it
was traveling in the vicfnity of 1-20, heading west. When I first saw the object, it was in the direction of Morgan Mill, TX,
which is to my SE. Al it's closest, the object was probably slightly north of Cisco, TX. I lost sight of object when It simply
disappeared In the direction of Baird, TX. Observation lasted approx. 2minutes.
Figure 15 (20660) Breckenridge Is between to flight routes.
34
l.
Figure 16 (20660) Light In the Tel(as Sky depiction of lights track
Figure 17 (20660) Depiction of sighting by p843(a)(2) !of Lights in the Te><as Sky
OBJECT DESCRIPTION: seevanouscasefilesabove
35
EVIDENCE: Back in October this newspaper article came up and seems to describe some of the same type of
"lights• activity that would be seen a month later. Such repetitious activity suggest amilitary influence and control.. .
They're baaaack (again)
Unidentified lights reappear in Erath
Area residents are once again reporting strange lights in the sky above Erath County, and much like the reports that flooded in
rollowing awidespread sighting in January 2008, witne es say the amber glowing orbs are like nothing they've seen before.
In the most recent unexplained ighting, a Hamilton County businessman was greeted by the lights as he left ameeting.
Jerry McAdam , publisher or the Hico News Review and Hico ISO school board member, said he was leaving a board meeting
Monday with a rellow board member when they aw lwo amber lights, which w re level with each other and seemed 10 hover In
the sky.
'They (the lights) were low in the ky and disappeared in about five seconds," McAdams said. 'Then lwo more appeared, closer
together.'
He said the lights disappeared several times and reappeared seconds later Each time the lights were the same amber color,
and appeared at different heights and varying distances apart. McAdams said the lights did not move when they were visible or
blink. He also said the lights were not like those typically associated with aircraft.
'They were not red,green or while. They did not Hash like on an airplane,• he said. 'There was no motion. Each time they
appeared, they were further to the left. I would say they came and went in three cycles.•
McAdams said he could not determine the distance of the lights from his Hamilton County vantage poln but said the lights were
to the west, In the direction of Dubl n, in the southwest portion of Erath County.
·1have never seen anything Ilka that before." McAdams sad. "But I do believe what I saw was like previous {reported) sightings.'
Two Dublin area neighbors, who asked to remain anonymous, were in their homes when the men walked out and saw •a11 klnds
of lights, all across the sky" Monday.
The men captured what they saw on acell p one. The grainy recording offers a glimpse of an amber light that appears in the sky
several times, and captures the excitement of the group.
One of the men said they first saw asingle ball of hghl, 'not hke a Rashhght or aircraft,' which suddenly spawned several other
lights.
•11 was llke the lights were coming off the first ball (of light) we saw,' the man said."And they kepi coming, one after another, and
moved in every direction '
The man said the lights were white and amber and the whole spectacle lasted alittle more than aminute. He said no sound was
associated with the sighting, until jets rushed toward the display.
He also said he is not ready to say he saw an alien aircraft, but does believe the unidentified lights were Impressive.
'I don't know what It was, but whatever the lights were, they were truly awesome." he said.
Copyright Cl 2009- Stephenvle Emi-e-Tribune • StepherMJe, TX
36
There were reader comment online about the article which give a little insight into how difficult it is for
multiple witnesses to accurately describe an object when seeing the same thing.
RNderCommera
The r ~ n COO'ffll11I from the IUdlr5 In no wry cb ~ 1'8Jlfe&enl lhe \'IN of empretllbJne com
•-•:ndDNWlde on Ocl 21, 200911.57 AM
• They NI..,_, S.hm jlllt at ol ConnM Crully. Six F16'1 on 11111NM111 (tqlplng 111191.•
UlLWRll9 on Od'22 2009 12:53 AM
• F18'1englnelCIII be l l l n - r y - ~ E'llnf!llffl jlllt !)Ill 1t1e Sald0n cut df up OIi I hll )'OU can hNrl'le 1nll111gong lhough
- - · · -C«III upwllllacraftWI hM dolngllll lhll cant nm nalleand I'll buy you skit, 111111 lllen Mr dalatpli0nl and
,ocn JUII don't aid up.
ET(Empn Trtbllle• • ) lhey llMf llft.l.Ol. '
... W J/11lleon Ocl 22. 2009 9 30 AM.
'Goll 1V11wlll dbinglllm- wt.I 111111 llldllatp!lcn hl. ."8llllt lhlng Ilhol9'l abaul Al far the 10111d, IUrt )'OU can ha t.e
trlillftomlll 5eldlrl CUMll...lrl(J.llt I dlltlllCI but lrl It FWf/t lllelMll llllludl. Pins wll be ffllCh hlpr, MCI lll0lt likely ffllCh ftr1lw
N8/ IO )'OU dDn't. . 118C8118f11y llar lllln. •
..........lfflla 1111 Ocl 22. 200912.30 PM
"I fDr;al tolWIIOfl I. . In c.m.dlllOwlllfl IIIJ• llty wnp!a)lbly ICl'IIIMWlll'OUd Oulllln. Tl-, _.lillraly i.tng up the
lklel. SIii F18'1. S. fllm...!Ud 118m...MINllll8rn dlop .._ So La. ma,t,e jull rneybewhll )'OU IN. . 101,181hl119 dlrnnt. They
n iflWI ...• 11111 lllclawaelt No UfO'I h8rt ),If jell MCI. . .. •
UlL wrole on Oct 22. 2009 11 35 PM
• Yep, 1va1111t....., can llflc:t hows llll'J1111'91can tit head•• llldfftlm Hico to Dulllln or Hlffllltcfl you wouldn't ha null u
tobdlllra.lllMl~good-ofllltDIMllklllnow, ~IIMnMl'_.lfl'/dllllltllP()llldllt'IIIII.
11111 .... of8IIU'llt ~lllllCIMCl 118._,.....,alllnll, F18'1, h8lacqlllrl, ll8altlbomblll and Ill lb. It would be niOtb
knowmi:ly_ll_lllflnldll, bullllllhllUIUllynMr~ln11111ine.'
Nllw2Nlfflllon 0d26,20099.53AM
·111111.
_,.,,_WRlllon0d 26 200912'47PM
• Anmlng 1111111111112peapltari ..... 111111 NClllllng lllliemctarne lml l!ld hM 2 cllfnntecplwllonl torwhalthey-. •
b. I 7 SWl'DIICII OCI 27. 2009 1·32 PM·
'Didan,a.hlppa,to•lllellfihtllglltclcato:J1710'MldFWIIOIIIICl1henadtllel'Oldlldepalllnlllleoldt.nlhlltalleftaa
en Illefnlrt d II? 0dGber 1G, abcu 5:45 AM. ft_. not h Ille but lo be IIOUlld ne ' IMI. •
37
EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE:
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE: none
WITNESS'S INTERVIEW: Refer to case files above
FINDINGS OF THIS REPORT:
A case for the 3 helicopters and arrays:
A Case for Jets and flares:
A Case for TR-3B:
A case for the unknown:
Figure 18 (General Reference) photo- Lines of Sights from witness intersect
suggesting a possible flight path of the object/light.
Case Report MUFON SIP Deployment
Case# 20706 CAT 2 MUFON Deployment
Investigators: IAAP Person 103 IAAP Person 104
1843(a)(3)
GPS COORDINATES :
COORDINATES ACCURACY: Exact, coordinates taken with GPS at effected area of
event on Highway
Location: Port Jervis, NY objected headed towards Unionville
DATE OF EVENT: 11/25/09
TIME OF EVENT: 12:15 AM Loca l ( ) Exact ( X ) Approximate
39
On November 25, 2009 , a STAR team CAT 2 Deployment was activated on Case
#20706 in Port Jervis NY. STAR Team lnvestigatofAP Person 103 lwas assigned as
AAP
103 Person - lead~nvestw-at-o·r·
' I:>
·- is the Chief Technical Advisor for STAR Team.
lnvestigato AAP Pe,rson 104 was secondary investigato r.I .. ----!was-State........-.....~ :-Person
Coordinator.
IAAP Person 59
MUFON (Mutual UFO Network)
STAR Team Manager
SIP Project Coordinator
Background : The primary Witness is a 41-year old male. The Witness is a mental
health professional and work~1843(a)(2) 1- He is married
and lives with his wife at an undisclosed location in Port Jervis, NY. Investigators
found t his witness to be highly credible. He was still visibly shaken from his
encounter.
Witness was very concerned about maintaining his anonymity in regards to th is
sighting report. He refused to sign a th ird party release form when asked by
investigators.
The Witness did allow Investigators to Video tape the interview at his home, but
requested the camera be pointed at the floo r to protect his identity. Investigators
also Videotaped the interview at the affected area along the road side, as
witnessed pointed out the details of the event.
40
Witness Narrative: CMS Sighting Report) I left work at 12am as I work 4pm till
12am, I work in 1843(a)(2) which is approx 15 minutes from port Jervis where I live,
the quickest route is to take the Minisink turnpike then to the Greenville turnpike, I
was driving on the Minisink turnpike when I noticed lights in the sky, firstly I
thought it was a plane then I noticed it had 5 lights on it from end to end the lights
went from blue-white-red-white-blue in that order but the strangest thing was it
was turning clockwise slowly and the only sound I could hear was like a cat
purring, I slowed the car down to around 20 mph to get a better look then I
noticed the size it must of been around 200 feet in length, I proceeded to speed up
as I started to get nervous but as it passed over the car the car turned off I came
to a stop and grab bed my cell phone and noticed that had turned off too, by this
1
time I didn't know whether to get out of the car and run or stay in my car before I
came to the decision the lights had gone out and the car started up I put my foot
down a sped up the road not looking back I tell you it was the most unnerving
things to happen to me.
Investigator Report: Investigators left Bowling Green, VA at about 1:30 p.m. on
11/26/09, arriving at Port Jervis, NY at 8:30 p.m. Investigators met with the
witness at his home on 11/27/09 at 10:15 a.m.
The witness. worksl1843(a)( 2) 1- He leaves work
around midnight and it takes approximately 15 minutes to get home. He
takes a route which goes through a rural area with curving roads. He said
that he was "semi-tired but not tired enough to blank out." He was playing
Christmas CDs on the radio and singing as he drove. He drove through
Unionville up to the Minisink Turnpike. Coming around a bend in the road,
he could see an object about a mile away - it looked pretty small. As he
came to the next turn, he slowed down to about 25 miles to get a better
look at it, then it was almost on top of him and he doesn't understand how
it crossed the distance from where he first saw it to where he was in such a
short time.
He stopped his vehicle along the side of the road and remembers putting
the car in PARK, with the engine running. He could now also see that it
41
looked cigar-shaped and was turning clockwise slowly (on axis) as it came
towards him. He described the speed as slow like a hot air balloon . When
asked to compare the size of the object to an aspirin at arm's length, the
witness said that it would be about the size of a baseball.
According to the witness description, there were lights (blue, white, red,
white and blue in that order) so he knew it wasn't a plane. He heard a
sound like a cat that was purring at a low frequency (continuously vibrating)
As the object passed over the witnesses vehicle, the engine just stopped as
if someone had turned off the ignition . The Witness tried to use his cell
phone but it wouldn't work despite the fact that he always keeps it
charged. He also tried to roll down the electric car window but it wouldn't
work either. He thought about getting out. He opened the door slightly
but then reconsidered and closed the door.
When he looked at the lights they seemed very bright but they didn't
illuminate the ground; the witness said he can't explain this aspect as it
doesn't make any sense to him. The craft appeared gun metal gray against
the dark sky.
After about 1.5 minutes the craft's lights blinked out and the witnesses
vehicle started up without any action on the part of the witness. He put
the car into drive and put the pedal down. All he wanted to do was find
someone, find civilization. He was terrified! He didn't even
look in his rearview mirror and says there is "no way I' m going to take that
road again." Witness recalled running through several STOP signs on the
way home. He said that he nearly crashed the car into a fence he was so
scared. The witness stated that he actually doesn't want to even drive
along that road again.
42
► When he got home, he told his wife who said "well, maybe it was a plane"
but the witn1ess knows that it wasn't a plane. His wife also suggested that
he call the police but he didn't see what good that would do. Instead, he
paced back and forth and drank a beer. He was so unnerved that he
couldn't sleep for about two hours. He then goggled "how to report a UFO"
and the first thing that came up was MUFON. He said that he wrote down
exactly what remembered in his report. He wants to know what it is.
Physiological (Medical) Effects: Witness reported that he had a toothache since
his sighting but didn't notice any other physiological effects. He did not wish to be
scanned for an implant. (investigator was prepared to conduct a magnetic scan)
~j Person Physical Effects - Investigator.!..___!inspected the cell phone and found it to be
working properly.
Radiological Survey: Investigators checked the affected Vehicle for radiation,
without any unusual readings (consistent with background)
Investigators surveyed the site of the event (road side) and reading at the
affected area were consistent with background reading.
Electromagnetic- Electrostatic Effects: Investigators did find very significant
abnormal readings on the subject vehicle with a tri-field meter. The witness was
driving a 2009 Midsize 4 door sedan that was approximately 2 months old.
Investigators conducted electro-static and electro-magnetic field tests on the
Witnesses Vehicle (SUBJECT VEHICLE) and then went to a car dealer and selected
an identical vehicle to the witnesses vehicle (TEST VEHICLE) same make model
and year for comparison testing.
Both the electro-static and electro-magnetic fields appear to have been
dramatically affected. Specific meter reading (as to intensity) were not available,
because the meter (pictured} pegged the needle in the proximity of the SUBJECT
VEHICLE.
See photos next page
43
SUBJECT VEHICLE - Driver's side
rear engine compartment magnetic field reading. (Full intensity needle pegged)
44
TEST VEHICLE - Driver's side
rear engine compartment magnetic field reading.
45
SUBJECT VEHICLE - Passenger's side
rear engine compa rtment magneti c fie ld reading. (Full intensity needle pegged)
46
TEST VEHICLE - Passenger's side
rear engine compartment magnetic field reading
I--.
Note: The witness said that it seems like the car is actually driving faster
now...almost as if he got a free tune up.
AAP Person Note: for unknown reasons, it appears that at some point during the
103 ., ,...... -·•- ....
investitfaUon; ·--- ..- ikon 0700 battery failed and the backup battery also
~i P:r.~?.n. .Jail.ed. -- · · recalls, however, that at all areas which he checked on the witness'
vehicle, the EMF meter remained at maximum reading as long as the meter was
~: P~~5.?.~ _withJn3_.i nches-of..t-he.-Wi~sses' car-:-1- Ihas no explanation for the camera's
multiple battery fai lure. The batteries were charged beforehand and normally will
take over 1000 phot os w ith GPS enabled. The first photos were taken at the sit e
~f P:~~?n _of.the .even.t.-{ ···-·- f hecked the camera's batteries after taking pictures at the AAP Person
site of t he event and a 94% charge remained. I =:J-t-hefl-r-e-t-t:trned-to-the-·-· 103··
witness' home to take photos of his two month old 2009 car. I --·---+to-Ok.over... ro,;~erson
47
100 photos of the witness' car. Only 12 photos documenting the magnetic testing
~: P:~:?_~---~-!1.d .110.ne_oJ_theEMEiesting..tur:neci--0Yt.!- !then tested the exact same car
model in a car dealer's lot with a digital camera ("test vehicle.")
Note: While we were with the witness, he had a tel ephone call which did not
display a number and when he answered, there was no response on the other
end. This has happened a couple of times since the event. The witness also
states that his phone has been affecting his speakers since the incident and we
~: P:r.:0 n hearda_strang.e._stati.csoun.ciou.r.seJves.--j- !checked the phone for electro
magnetic and electro-static effects and found none.
Summary: The investigators did not notice any major contradictions in witness
testimony, nor did the witness appear to falter in any of th e questions of detail.
• Investigators found this witness to be highly credible. He was still visibly
shaken from his encounter.
• The witness denies any medical conditions or taking any medications that
affect his ability to think or concentrate.
• The investigators questioned for the possibility of lost time, without any
indication of such, evident from the witness testimony.
• This Investigation yields a reliance primarily on a single witness testimony
of events.
• Independent evidence was a electromagnetic and electrostatic effect s on
the effected vehicle as compared to test vehicle of identical make and
model.
48
• Natural phenomenon was ruled out as a possibility because of the
proximity to the witness, movement patterns, and contact/effects of the
witness.
• A radiological survey was conducted and readings in the affected area were
consistent with the background readings in the unaffected control area .
END REPORT
49
Case Report MUFON SIP Deployment
Case # 20264-20123-20268 Case Type: Cat 2
Investigator: ...
IM_P_P_e_rs_on
__122
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
GPS COORDINATES: 1843(a)( 3)
COORDINATES ACCURACY: Within (51) feet of coordinates.
1. LOCATION: ********Tomball, Texas
2. LOCATION: •••••••*Tomball, Texas
3. LOCATION: 1-35 South Bound in Georgetown, Texas
1. DATE OF EVENT: November 01, 2009 Case 20264
2. DATE OF EVENT: October 25,2009 Case 20123
3. DATE OF EVENT: November 01,2009 Case 20268
1. TIME OF EVENT: 21:57 hrs ( x) Exact ( ) Approximate
2. TIME OF EVENT: 03:20 hrs. ( x) Exact ( ) Approximate
3. TIME OF EVENT: Unknown
On November 02, 2009 a CAT 2 Star team Deployment In Tomball TX was
authorized and investigator!MP Person 122 jwas assigned as lead investigator. I
accompanied the investigator and videotaped the witness testimony.
50
IAAP Person 59
MUFON (Mutual UFO Network)
STAR Team Manager
SIP Project Coordinator
• Background Case #1 Nineteen year old girl comes home and hears a loud
sound and looks out in her back yard and sees a disk like object floating in
her back ya rd .
• Background Case #2 Forty seven year old female in bed heard loud nose
passed over her house, looked her out window and saw nothing.
• Background Case #3 Unknown submitter stated that they saw an object in
a field while traveling south bound on 1-35 in Georgetown, Texas.
Synopsis:
November 2, 2009 this investigator received a deployment notification
from IAAP Person 59 lin reference to female witness an object hovering in her back
yard. In the report the witness stated t hat she had arrived home on November
first around 21:57 hrs. Witness stated in her report that she was in the kitchen
and heard a noise that kept getting loud. The witness then stated that she went to
the back door and saw a saucer like object hovering about 20 feet in the air in her
back yard.
During this investigation this investigator learned that two other sighting reports
had been reported to the CMS data base. These sighting reports are linked
together because they be related. Giving their time frame and the information in
51
the witness statements they should be added to this report to support the
witness statement.
Investigator Narrative:
AAP Person
On November 02 2009 at 10:19 hrs this lnvestigato~ ---+recefve-a··a·------ • 122
deploy notice from SIP CoordinatorlAAP Person 59 Ito investigate a possible sighting
at*******, Tomball, Harris County, Texas. At 11:20 hrs this Investigator contact
the witness by public service and a meeting was setup for 13:00 hrs. At 13:15 hrs
this Investigator met with the witness at her residence. This Investigator
interviewed the witness to get a better idea of what she saw. This Investigator
had the witness to show me where the object had been in the back yard. The
witness proceeded to the back yard and in the south west corner of the yard,
where the witness stated the object was above this Investigator located plants
that appeared to be under stress from some type of radiation or heat.
During my investigation the owner has a large white dog that was sick and was
throwing up. I questioned the witness about this and she stated she had no idea
what was wrong with him. At 13:20 hrs witness stated that the school had called
and someone had to go pick up her nephew. The school had reported that the
child was sick and was throwing up as well.
At 13:35 hrs this Investigator contacted!AAP Person 59 I that the area
in the back yard suffered from plant stress and the reported the illness of the
~P P:_~~~.r:!_ch iJ9_ , g !ld pet+ . - !stated to secure the area and not have anyone go in
AAP Person th:~~-~~ -y~rJtJ .- -- ~e was flying to Houston with the proper equipment
59 ··-·· -·-to check the area for radiation.
At 18:15 hrs this Investigator picked u AAP Person 59 at Bush IAH and we
returned to the witness residence. At 19:26 hr PPerson 59 and this lnvestigatorAAP Person
arrived at the witness residence to check the back yard for possible radiation. 59~---·· •
I
!AAP Person 59 reported to the witness that there was no sign of radiation~.....__ _....
~P P:r,~9r1_l --·· !interviewed the witness and she stated that she was would be available for
I
interview the next day after 16:30 hrs.jAAP Person 59 advised the witness that we
would return the next day for video interview.
52
• •
At 15:35 hrs this Investigator and IAAP Person 59 I
______ returned to********** to
interview the witnesses in this case. ( See Witness Statements)
Location#1:
This sighting took place at*******, Tomball, Harris County, Texas. This residence
is a 1843(a)(2), 1843(a)(3) . The residence is
located on 1843(a)(2), 1843(a)(3)
Location #2:
This sighting took place at **** , Tomball, Harris County, Texas. This residence
is a 1843(a)(2), 1843(a)(3)
....,...,.,..,...,..,.,,.,.___,__,..,...,..,..-,----------.---- . The residence is location on the
1843(a)(2), 1843(a)( 3) . Witness was not available for interview.
Location #3:
This sighting took place in the rural area of Georgetown, Williamson County,
Texas near the highway 1-35 south bound side. Witness was not available for
interview.
Object Description: 20264
The witness reported the object to be about 20 feet in diameter and about 7 feet
high. Witness reported that the object had a saucer like shape to it. The top
section was reported to have more of a cone convex shape to it, with raised
panels to it. The bottom section had a slight convex shape with a gray metal
surface. In the middle of the craft witness stated that it had square lights light
that seemed to go around the craft. The lights in the middle turned on and
seemed too rotate around the middle of the craft when the witness went to the
back door. The witness stated that the craft had a loud rocket sound. (See
attached drawing by witness)
53
Drawing done by witness Case 20264
G
54
1843(a)(2)
Location and appox. size of craft, photo and drawing not to scale.
Object Description: 20123
On Octob r 24, 2009 r c ived report from witness she had heard a loud noise
av r her hous bout 0300 hrs. Th location of this residence was given at
********Tomball, Harris County, Texas. Witness stated that she looked out the
window from her bed room but saw nothing.
Object Description: 20268
On November 01 2009 at an unknown time a witness reported to the CMS data
base a craft fitting the description (of the craft in case number 20268) setting in a
field off of 1-35 in or near Georgetown, Tex s. Witness did not list ny contact
information other than an e-mail address of p a43(a)(2) I Furth r
inv stigation on th -m ii ddress shou ld be conducted.
Evidence:
Case 20264
On 11/02/2009 at 13:45 hrs this investigator photographed the outside residence
includes the front and rear of the house. The area where the witness stated that
55
the craft was hovering plants appeared to under stress from an unknown heat
source. (See attach ed photos) Photo on the left was taken by this investigator.
Photos were taken with a Nikon 35mm 6006 with a 35 to 80mm lens. The type of
film used was Kodak ASA 400. Note: that the end of berries had ash appearance
and to th e touch of it crumb led to a fine ash like substan ce. Notice in the photo
"A" that t he ends of t he buds have been burned. In photo "b" the ends are
normal without the burned.
1843(a)(2)
Abnormal photo Normal photo
Evaluation of Evidence:
Case 20264
On November 04, 2009 at 11:24 hrs this Investigator met with 1843(a){2)
1843(a)(2)
Houston, Harris County, Texas. 1843(a)(2) identified the plant as a Duranta.
p s43(a)(2) !stated that it was a common plant grown in the East Texas area and
easy to obtain in most local nurseries. From the sample of the plant t hat was 1843<a)(2)
removed from the scene located at *******, Tomball, Harris County, Texasi=::i ··
l1843(a)(2) I
stated that the pla.nt had been e_xposed to some type of heat.~ 184
~(a)( )
2
1843(a)(2) stated that the berries were over sized and the ends had been burned. ···--
: 1a43(a)(2) stated that at this time it is unknown what type of heat source would
have caused the damage to the plant. During my investigation I noticed that there
56
was other plant life that had signs of stress, but they had no indication of burning.
The child in question that reported to be sick the witness stated that he was fine
and as well as the dog. This investigator could not find any sign of burning on the
ground or the house. At this time it is unknown to this Investigator what caused
the burning of the Duranta.
Evidence:
Case 20124
Nothing of value was collected by this investigator.
Evidence
Case 20268
Nothing of value was collected by this investigator
Physical Evidence:
Case 20264
A. 12 inch branch taken from Duranta bush located south west corner of the
back yard. This evidence was collected to identify the type of plant and
comparison.
B. Photographs taken by this Investigator
C. Witness statements take bt'P Person 59
WITNESS INTERVIEW
Case 20264
MP Person 59
On November 03, 2009 at approx. 17:45 hr ......,__ _ __ interviewed the
following witnesses at******* Tomball, Harris County, exas. Media Release
forms were signed and dated by witnesses.
*******(See Video)
*******(See Video)
Witness Interview
Case 20268
No witness statement taken
57
Witness Interview
Case 20123
No witness statement taken
Findings of this Report:
This Investigator after interviewing the witnesses and reviewing the
evidence in this case it is my opinion that this report should be listed as an
unknown object. The lack of evidence i.e. photographs of the object it may never
determine what the witness saw.
There is supporting evidence from the stress in the plants in the back yard there
could have been something from an unknown origin. It should be noted that two
other reports were made by witnesses on the same day and a week earlier.
EOR.
58
Summary of Utah Ranch
Investigations November 2009
This Utah Ranch St atus Update Is divided into 4 Sections:
(a) Utah Ranch Security Officer Events
(b) Report on Recent Utah Ranch Surrounding Property Investigations
(c) Status of Experiments on Utah Ranch
(d)l 1843(a)(2) I
(a)Utah Ranch Security Officer Events:
Since BAASS init iat ed round the clock surveillance of t he Utah property on August
3, 2009 t he security officers have reported multiple incident s: As described in
previous reports, BAASS continues to deploy security officers to the ra nch
property. The fornowing are selected reports from the officers with areas of
pot ential interest detailed in yellow.
(10 November 09) 091 110
Patrol/Observations
.ujg)43(a)
1
1843(a)(2) . At 1630.1, wit..h.j----·-!conducted a patrol along the southern tree line following
th e creek adjacent to Homestead 1 to the western property boundary. I took
several photos revealing no anomalies/orbs. During this t ime I checked for signs
of unauthorized people attempting to gain access to the property. I found no
signs of trespassers or anything out of the ordinary.
I.
At 2030 I went to the East Gate with l1843(a)(2) There was no vehicle t raffic/foot
t raffic while posted at the East Gate. I took several photos revea ling no
59
anomalies/orbs. I returned to Homestead 1 to warm up and make contact with
11a43(a)(2) l
~s843(a)(2)
At 2000 we conducted a tactical walking patrol to the West-side of the property
and back. We stopped at Homestead 2 and Homestead 3 to conduct an LPOP. We
scanned with NVGs; there were no signs of trespassers and or anomalies to
report. We returned to homestead one to warm up.
~ 1843(a)(2)
1843(a2(~L _. At0025I -···· · !was at the c o ~ n d-E]was sitting on the couch a::=:]was.inJ.?~-~-(~)(2)
1a43(a)( 2L. . t_
~e restroom).-The stereo-beneath the TV in the living room all of the sudden
·- turned on by itself. It was tuned in to the local country radio station. The last time
the stereo was on was 4 Nov (on the same local country radio station). The
remote control for the stereo was on the stereo speaker next to the stereo. All of
the other remotes were on the coffee table. We took several photos in the living
room revealing nothing out of the ordinary. The stereo has a power button that
you physically have to depress to turn on or off. There were no strange feelings
felt byj1843(a)(2) I The temperature inside the trailer was 73 degrees.
There were no strange odors or anything else out of the ordinary. 1I ---- llisten.ed _1_843(~)(2)
to the stereo every day for two weeks my last time at the ranch and never
experienced this occurrence. We decided to remain at Homestead 1 and observe
for anything out of the ordinary. We took photos with the lights off also revealing
no anomalies. We, observed in and outside of Homestead 1 with no further
findings.
Investigator Notes
The locks on Dog Run 1 and Dog Run 2 were still in place and locked. The pennies
were in the same configuration as they were left.
60
84_3(_a)_(2_l _ _ _____.I departed at 0445 to takej1843(a)( 2)
....l1_ I
to the airport.
Weather Note
33 degrees, clear, 0mph winds, 58% Humidity
V/r j1843(a)(2)
{17 November 09) 091117
Patrol/Observations
~ 1843(a)(2)
1843(a)(2)
At approx 1630, we conducted a patrol along the southern tree line with L...-------1
During the patrol we checked for signs of unaut horized people attempting to gain
access to the property. We found no
Fuente: archivo UAP oficial del gobierno de EE.UU. (dominio público) · war.gov/ufo ↗ · ver el archivo completo de Nodriza